<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Hoz</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Hoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>Hey, Nicole,
Very true... It seems as if others went on the bandwagon as we say when Social Media really became popular. They did not start in the beginning, only starting when other software made it &quot;easier&quot; to get these items. I really believe that we need some kind of &quot;real&quot; certification. Not just a way to show that, &quot;Yes, I do this and I&#039;m perfect at it.&quot; It should be more of showing that they are actually good, certifying that they actually somehow know what they&#039;re doing. Specializations could be made as a way for a person to get what he &quot;needs&quot; instead of what he wants, but has no clue on what people know how to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Nicole,<br />
Very true&#8230; It seems as if others went on the bandwagon as we say when Social Media really became popular. They did not start in the beginning, only starting when other software made it &#8220;easier&#8221; to get these items. I really believe that we need some kind of &#8220;real&#8221; certification. Not just a way to show that, &#8220;Yes, I do this and I&#8217;m perfect at it.&#8221; It should be more of showing that they are actually good, certifying that they actually somehow know what they&#8217;re doing. Specializations could be made as a way for a person to get what he &#8220;needs&#8221; instead of what he wants, but has no clue on what people know how to do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Report] for January 16th 2010 - AndreaVascellari.com &#124; Andrea Vascellari</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comment-5579</link>
		<dc:creator>[Report] for January 16th 2010 - AndreaVascellari.com &#124; Andrea Vascellari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695#comment-5579</guid>
		<description>[...] Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one â€¦ by @nicolesimo... &#8211; Nicole comments on comment so called experts. Well written post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one â€¦ by @nicolesimo&#8230; &#8211; Nicole comments on comment so called experts. Well written post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695#comment-5568</guid>
		<description>Hello Nicole, I found you via a comment you made a couple of years ago regarding Ning.

I agree with your comments here, especially the &quot;responsibility of every consultant to assess what the clients wants / haves / needs ..&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nicole, I found you via a comment you made a couple of years ago regarding Ning.</p>
<p>I agree with your comments here, especially the &#8220;responsibility of every consultant to assess what the clients wants / haves / needs ..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article &#38; Slideshow: The Future of Social Media Monitoring &#124; Kalooz.com</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Article &#38; Slideshow: The Future of Social Media Monitoring &#124; Kalooz.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>[...] Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one â€¦ â€œSocial Media Somethingâ€ is what customers are looking for Believe it or not, â€œSocial Media Somethingâ€ is actually what works for the normal people (you know, the ones with the budgets). They want even more specific things, and I am waiting for it to come up in the â€œso called social media specialistâ€ postings: â€œand there are even people who call themselves (insert your favourite play toy here) experts!â€. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one â€¦ â€œSocial Media Somethingâ€ is what customers are looking for Believe it or not, â€œSocial Media Somethingâ€ is actually what works for the normal people (you know, the ones with the budgets). They want even more specific things, and I am waiting for it to come up in the â€œso called social media specialistâ€ postings: â€œand there are even people who call themselves (insert your favourite play toy here) experts!â€. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-12-28 &#124; Don&#39;t mind Rick</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comment-5560</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-12-28 &#124; Don&#39;t mind Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695#comment-5560</guid>
		<description>[...] Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one â€¦ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one â€¦ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der ewige Expertenkonflikt&#8230; &#124; Banedon's Cyber-Junk</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comment-5559</link>
		<dc:creator>Der ewige Expertenkonflikt&#8230; &#124; Banedon's Cyber-Junk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695#comment-5559</guid>
		<description>[...] diesen Worten beginnt Nicole Simon ihren aktuellen Blog Post undÂ Â beschreibt weiter den Konflikt der Evangelisten, Experten, Gurus und wie sie sich alle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] diesen Worten beginnt Nicole Simon ihren aktuellen Blog Post undÂ Â beschreibt weiter den Konflikt der Evangelisten, Experten, Gurus und wie sie sich alle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

