<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing defined / Yahoo to change their Tos already?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crueltobekind.org/playing-defined-yahoo-to-change-their-tos-already-111/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crueltobekind.org/playing-defined-yahoo-to-change-their-tos-already-111</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/playing-defined-yahoo-to-change-their-tos-already-111#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/playing-defined-yahoo-to-change-their-tos-already-111#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Ethan, it is no big deal to me, but I welcome the possibility to look back at that post and think about if it really just reads as if being just about the money. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan, it is no big deal to me, but I welcome the possibility to look back at that post and think about if it really just reads as if being just about the money. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Stock</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/playing-defined-yahoo-to-change-their-tos-already-111#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/playing-defined-yahoo-to-change-their-tos-already-111#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Nicole, 
Apologies for the reductionist link.  It&#039;s an artifact of blog link conventions much more than any particuarly well-thought-out summary of my opinion on your post.
Cheers,
Ethan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole,<br />
Apologies for the reductionist link.  It&#8217;s an artifact of blog link conventions much more than any particuarly well-thought-out summary of my opinion on your post.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Ethan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

