<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco, April 16th til 22nd + request for comments.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Thinking about something is not doing it ... thanks for the feedback. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about something is not doing it &#8230; thanks for the feedback. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Share</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Share</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Localization is still a problem but not as much a hurdle as it used to be, IMHO. In the US, users are sharing content and creating widgets. In Europe, they&#039;re often using US sites to share localized content and localized widgets. I also think European Web2.0 is about the old bureaucratic barriers coming down but above all, the rise of open-source empowerment.

More here: http://jobmob.co.il/blog/web20-israel-better-than-europe/

Have a great conference, Nicole!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Localization is still a problem but not as much a hurdle as it used to be, IMHO. In the US, users are sharing content and creating widgets. In Europe, they&#8217;re often using US sites to share localized content and localized widgets. I also think European Web2.0 is about the old bureaucratic barriers coming down but above all, the rise of open-source empowerment.</p>
<p>More here: <a href="http://jobmob.co.il/blog/web20-israel-better-than-europe/" rel="nofollow">http://jobmob.co.il/blog/web20-israel-better-than-europe/</a></p>
<p>Have a great conference, Nicole!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Scholz</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Scholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/san-francisco-april-16th-til-22nd-request-for-comments-376#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Well, in general I think web2.0 solutions could think of the international market a bit more (and also stuff like Second Life, I am not even able to use umlauts in scripts to return proper messages). And if you e.g. look at Jott, then there is no way to use it in Germany right now (except with quite some costs). This is of course partly a ressource limitation (esp. at the beginning) but in general everybody should maybe think a bit more internationally as there&#039;s probably still some market to address.

Language versions also come to mind (not such a problem of mine but of others). It&#039;s usually not too hard to translate applications, nevertheless it&#039;s not that often done from the beginning on. And esp. in Europe there is of course quite a mix of languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in general I think web2.0 solutions could think of the international market a bit more (and also stuff like Second Life, I am not even able to use umlauts in scripts to return proper messages). And if you e.g. look at Jott, then there is no way to use it in Germany right now (except with quite some costs). This is of course partly a ressource limitation (esp. at the beginning) but in general everybody should maybe think a bit more internationally as there&#8217;s probably still some market to address.</p>
<p>Language versions also come to mind (not such a problem of mine but of others). It&#8217;s usually not too hard to translate applications, nevertheless it&#8217;s not that often done from the beginning on. And esp. in Europe there is of course quite a mix of languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

