<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cruel to be kind &#187; social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crueltobekind.org/tag/social-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crueltobekind.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Just because you only met social media idiots does not mean that everybody is one &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695</link>
		<comments>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every time the meme of &#8220;oh look those idiots are calling themselves Social Media [Gurus&#124;Experts&#124;Specialists]&#8221; comes up I get highly annoyed at the hidden insult. And the fact that this kind of posting most often is link bait.</p>
<p>Just because&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time the meme of &#8220;oh look those idiots are calling themselves Social Media [Gurus|Experts|Specialists]&#8221; comes up I get highly annoyed at the hidden insult. And the fact that this kind of posting most often is link bait.</p>
<p>Just because there are millions of nephews putting together web sites by clicking in Frontpage does not mean that there are no real web developers.  And just because there are millions who use Word merely as a better typewriter or Excel like a better calculator does not mean that others can&#8217;t do great stuff.</p>
<p>It is an insult not only to the people doing social media in the right way for their customer, but also to all the buyers out there: because obviously they are too stupid to figure out on their own which specialist will work best for their needs and requirements.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Social Media Something&#8221; is what customers are looking for</strong><br />
Believe it or not, &#8220;Social Media Something&#8221; is actually what works for the normal people (you know, the ones with the budgets). They want even more specific things, and I am waiting for it to come up in the &#8220;so called social media specialist&#8221; postings: &#8220;and there are even people who call themselves (insert your favourite play toy here) experts!&#8221;.</p>
<p>Customers are not searching for &#8220;basic training in how to use a computer and a browser&#8221;. Yet every day I see people typing in URLS by hand instead of using bookmarks. Customers are not looking for &#8220;basic training on how to use email&#8221; yet every day we can see solutions on &#8220;how to go email free and get work done&#8221;. It is stuff like this what the customers should pay for to learn to do it properly, because it will help them in the long run. But that is not what the customers are asking or paying for.</p>
<p>They are only paying &#8220;for that Internet thing&#8221; or nowadays &#8220;for that [Twitter|Facebook] thing&#8221;. People who make a living out of this can either stand in the corner with offerings which are &#8220;healthy&#8221; for the customer &#8211; or understand that this is not working and use the language the client understands. And then work from there.</p>
<p><strong>An Expert will fix everything &#8211; not</strong><br />
Some customer actually have a clear vision of what they want to achieve, what their resources are, what their possibilities are, etc. Most don&#8217;t. From my point of view it is the responsibility of every consultant to assess what the clients wants / haves / needs are and then decide if he or she is the right fit for this customer, this industry and or this project.</p>
<p>It includes knowing what <em>not</em> to give to the customer. Often customers are attracted by on one shiny thing (which 2009 was Twitter, take your pick in the other years from whatever is hyped). They want &#8220;a Twitter&#8221; but would be far better of by a newsletter or even something offline.</p>
<p>There are of course the people taking advantage of the miserable state of customers &#8211; but that is no excuse to blame it all just on one side. There are two parties in each deal.</p>
<p><strong>For standards you need metrics</strong><br />
Speaking of miserable state, I found the slides by <a href="http://www.webmetricsguru.com/archives/2009/12/self-proclaimed-experts-and-tweepsearch/">Marshall Sponder</a> very enlightening on the topic.</p>
<div id="__ss_2407236" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><a style="font:14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif;display:block;margin:12px 0 3px 0;text-decoration:underline;" title="The Future Of Social Media Monitoring Marshallsponder" href="http://www.slideshare.net/webmeticsguru/the-future-of-social-media-monitoring-marshallsponder">The Future Of Social Media Monitoring Marshallsponder</a><object style="margin:0px" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=thefutureofsocialmediamonitoring-marshallsponder-091102181251-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=the-future-of-social-media-monitoring-marshallsponder" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="margin:0px" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=thefutureofsocialmediamonitoring-marshallsponder-091102181251-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=the-future-of-social-media-monitoring-marshallsponder" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<p>So as long as we have no reliable metrics and meta data, we will stay in the wild wild west of social media. But he, what about those called for industry standards? Okay, how about you tell me the &#8220;industry standards for online marketing&#8221;. And then show me the &#8220;certified trainings and associations&#8221;.</p>
<p>So next time you see somebody complaining about the &#8220;so called experts&#8221; do me a favour: if you are knowledgable just make sure that your customers and friends know what to look for when they hire a freelancer or any company to do stuff for them &#8211; and not just when it is about social media.</p>
<p>Also worth reading (including the comments):<br />
<a href="http://thebrandbuilder.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/thanks-but-no-thanks-enough-with-the-nonsense-already/">Thanks, but no thanks: Enough with the nonsense already.</a></p>
<p><strong>But it worked awesome for the coaching industry!</strong><br />
I&#8217;d like to add the comment I left on <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/27/social-media-experts-twitter/">Mashable&#8217;s posting about fresh</a> &#8216;numbers of so called experts&#8217; where the argument of the industry standards with comparison to the coaching industry came up:</p>
<blockquote><p>So just because someone has a certificate makes them a good coach? And having learnt something at some day in their live to pass the exams (even if they include assignments over time) makes them better than somebody in another industry because there is no &#8216;association&#8217;?</p>
<p>I have been training people on how to use computers for two decades, how to use the Internet for biz for 11 years and nowadays that is mostly social media stuff. But I do not have any &#8216;certification&#8217; &#8211; which obviously means that I have no clue what I am doing nor am I capable of helping clients, because I call myself social media specialist.</p>
<p>The industry standards exist, and although Return on Investment is not what it is for many other areas, it exists. But it requires a lot of knowledge from the buyer which very often is not given. I hesitantly do say I am a social media specialist, but mostly for the reason that the buyers want this kind of description to differentiate with other areas of Internet related services.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh you do that Facebook stuff. And I need a Twitter!&#8221; is basically the knowledge of many &#8211; and having that, many of the not so skilled social media people are way ahead of those customers. Let&#8217;s imagine there is an exam on how to become &#8216;social media qualified&#8217;. Even with certification (how many coaches world wide are there again? How many of those work successfully without having ever seen a &#8216;certification&#8217;?) it does not guarantee success.</p>
<p>Put it differently: &#8220;I know way more about this stuff than you do and can explain it to you in a way that you will understand, work with you on your objectives, strategies and execution and make sure that you do not screw up on the way (assuming that you actually will listen and do what I tell you)&#8221; just does not fit in 160 characters of self description on a twitter bio &#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crueltobekind.org/just-because-you-only-met-social-media-idiots-does-not-mean-that-everybody-is-one-695/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter, Facebook and the rest &#8211; why you have to play around just to keep up</title>
		<link>http://crueltobekind.org/twitter-facebook-and-the-rest-why-you-have-to-play-around-just-to-keep-up-578</link>
		<comments>http://crueltobekind.org/twitter-facebook-and-the-rest-why-you-have-to-play-around-just-to-keep-up-578#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crueltobekind.org/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Summary: The internet is changing us and society so fast &#8211; how we work + communicate + interact + shop + research &#8211; that it is not enough anymore to just observe and only partly dive in. &#8220;Internet&#8221; is not</em>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Summary: The internet is changing us and society so fast &#8211; how we work + communicate + interact + shop + research &#8211; that it is not enough anymore to just observe and only partly dive in. &#8220;Internet&#8221; is not about going or being online any more, it is as relevant to our daily live as much as having warm water. I place &#8220;being connected&#8221; on my personal Maslow&#8217;s pyramid. It is nothing you should be looking at separately any more and still, many still do. The new motto should be: &#8220;Get playful, get experimental &#8211; or stay behind.&#8221; and applies especially to companies and organisations.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Going through my backlinks I found a great posting from blogger newbie Christina Rogge titled &#8220;<a title="Permanent Link to Just do it! The Nike-approach" rel="bookmark" href="http://christinarogge.com/?p=17">Just do it! The Nike-approach</a>&#8220;, describing her first steps. The quote which got my attention was the end of that first posting (emphasis mine)</p>
<blockquote><p>The major realization which struck me was that it is important to <em><a title="someone might agree with me" href="http://www.howtomakemyblog.com/inspiration/planning-to-start-a-blog-dont-plan-it-just-blog-it/" target="_blank">just do it</a>. </em>Start the website although one does not know everything about itÂ yet.<strong> Because the Internet is developing so fast, you can try to plan, but will never know if it is outdated by the time you are ready to implement.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>And that sentence just nails some thoughts floating around in my head for some time.Â  You need to experiment, you need to play around just to be able to get to know the things fast enough to start to make an informed decicsion. Not on a personal level, and especially not on a corporate level facing the customer.</p>
<p>There is no time any more to first have R&amp;D to figure some stuff out, or have somebody do some dossiers about if one should dare the experiment,Â  then get it approved, then move it on etc &#8211; everybody has to constantly work on those skills to be <strong>ready </strong>when you want to do something. And it is not limited any more to &#8220;let the other department do it&#8221; or &#8220;that is not my job&#8221;.</p>
<p>Even I &#8211; as somebody who lives this stuff &#8211; am amazed on the speed of how this is currently developping. I have started to implement in <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/NicoleSimon">my presentations</a> a list of &#8216;bad news&#8217;, which focus on Twitter but are usable in general. I am using their interest in Twitter to show them the other bases they should have covered a long time ago &#8211; works like a charm. ;)</p>
<h3>The bad news for you and your company</h3>
<p><strong>#1: Now is too late<br />
</strong>If you are starting to think about Twitter just now, you are already too late. That should have been on your map at least a year ago.</p>
<p><strong>#2: Buhu, my names are gone!</strong><br />
If your names are gone, stop complaining. You are a professionell entity and as such &#8220;securing accounts&#8221; should have been on your list at least 18 months ago and reference the one you use for domains with brands, names and products.</p>
<p><strong>#3: There are no bullet proof ways to do it</strong><br />
There is no blueprint how to do it. We are all experimenting and making it up as we go.</p>
<p><strong>#4: Twitter can only be part of you social media strategy.</strong><br />
You do have a social media strategy, right? Because this is what you already should be covering (covering not in the sense of doing it, but making sure you know if and how to use it or not.)</p>
<p><a title="The Conversation Prism by Brian Solis and Jesse Thomas" href="http://theconversationprism.com"><img style="border:0px #666 solid;" src="http://theconversationprism.com/convoprismembed.jpg" alt="" width="362" height="462" /></a></p>
<p><em>The Conversation Prism by <a href="http://briansolis.com">Brian Solis</a> and <a href="http://jess3.com">Jesse Thomas</a></em></p>
<p>Bonus fun feature for me to ask during the presentations:<br />
&#8220;But you do at least have an online strategy, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p><strong>#5:Â  Your employees HAVE to be trained by you and have to be guided.</strong></p>
<p>They are not stupid or anything but it is your job to make sure they can keep up to date. And that means much more than just one conference a year for upper management.</p>
<p><strong> #6: That business modell &#8220;Internet&#8221; or &#8220;Twitter&#8221; &#8211; not.</strong><br />
There is no money to be earned in Twitter. Nor on the Internet.<br />
There is only money to be made with business modells and implimentations of these strategies using tools like Twitter.</p>
<p>So basically nothing new. I leave them with the &#8220;good news&#8221; that per se this is not really something new, it is just some new technologies behind it. But their core job and skills stays the same.</p>
<p><strong>10 years old and still relevant</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465018653?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=ctbk-bu-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0465018653"><img class="alignright" title="Cluetrain Manifesto: 10 year edition" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41-0CC6UJqL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01_.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="240" /></a>Something else I throw in is the Cluetrain Manifesto (<a href="http://www.cluetrain.com/">web site</a> / <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465018653?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=ctbk-bu-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0465018653">book)</a>. It has been 10 years now that the cluetrain manifesto is out and still most companies are not even at the part of &#8220;we do have an online strategy&#8221;.</p>
<p>I myself will get a new copy because I actually never had the english one in print &#8211; when it came out I still had my &#8216;English is devil stuff&#8221; time. ;)</p>
<h3>Why you should work with people who know this stuff</h3>
<p>So, how does one do it? You talk to people who know a bit or two about this, work with their experience and use their judgement to see where something fits for your company, where you may have to look into because customers expect it and which are the areas you can ignore for now.</p>
<p>External advice and mentoring can only be part of the equation or it will cost you a lot of money. And by talking I do not mean just one session or so, but you need to have your resident expert on this, similar to the person doing your taxes or your layer. Parts of this belongs into your own hand, part of it you can outsource although it should be done on your side, but other parts you need to rely on the skill and training of the expert.</p>
<p>Where do you find such a person? Well, for starters you could talk to me, especially when you are in the European timezone of course (<a href="http://nicole-simon.eu/services">have a look at what I do</a>). There are a lot of people around who can help you with this &#8211; and if you would be in the space you would already know who they are. ;)</p>
<p>One way to find them is because they show up all the time with these new technologies. Which for one is the reason I have been in a lot of interviews for print, radio and tv over the years, first for podcasting, then second life, now twitter. It is not because I am good at faking to be a so called expert, it is just that I have played around with this stuff a lot longer than others and when somebody like me has put this into my regular toolkit, others start using it. Meaning I do have a head start plus by experience I do know how to use and implement those tools.</p>
<p>Look for these people and make a mental note if a name does show up regulary so you can test them if they are a fit for you and your organisation. Usually people like myself have preferences of people and kinds of organisations / corporations we like to deal with.</p>
<p><strong>This needs to be happening from top down</strong></p>
<p>Top management needs to give the okay for people to play around while making sure that people don&#8217;t create chaos. It is their responsibility to put up the strategies, free the budgets and use their brain to realize what this is about. Though in many companies it is still some employees who make their innocent first steps and need to be careful not to be caught. Similar to computer training (which happened in some parts) training in Social Media and co is now relevant for most of the customer facing side of the companies.</p>
<p>Different to just browsing the internet the evolution speed is now so fast that companies cannot rely on the individual to learn how to twitter, use facebook, blog etc etc.</p>
<p><strong>Twitter is a good starting point</strong></p>
<p>For one Twitter seems to be a great tool for people to get their feet wet for the first time in what we call Web 2.0 or Social Media or whatever. It is simple enough yet covers all the bases (sharing, communicating, collaboration etc), but is easy enough to handle (140 characters top and you even can do it from your mobile).</p>
<p>It also seems to be a great way to instead of starting to think about a big Social Media Strategy to start with a &#8220;what would we need to do / talk about / set into motion if we just wanted to start on twitter?&#8221; Going on from there, some other things fall into place and become clear.</p>
<p><strong>Start simple, learn, adjust, expand, rinse and repeat. Because the next big thing &#8211; Facebook &#8211; is already there. You do know how to do those, right? :)<br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crueltobekind.org/twitter-facebook-and-the-rest-why-you-have-to-play-around-just-to-keep-up-578/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

